Reply to comment

Fuzz's picture

OK

After a bit of review reading it looks like

At load:
GTX 280SC (my existing blown up card) – 86 (that’s fairly consistent with what I’ve found)
GTX 285 (Shad’s card) – 85 (although I’ll take this as an 86… their review said the 280 was 85)
GTX 580 – 76
GTX 680 – 78
GTX 680 SC (my potential card) – 80

So in general a bit lower… but I might consider the non SC edition of the EVGA card. Although… for 2 degrees screw it.

And noise wise… the 280 series said once it got to 86, the fan would be at full ball and I know what that sounds like. Am sure we’re hearing the same thing there.

For the 680 series

“As we can see, maintaining temperatures at its higher clocks doesn’t involve this card increasing its fan speeds. The SC+ actually maintains the exact same acoustical profile as the reference version which means it likely won’t be heard over the other fans in your case. “

Which is good.. means I may as well get the 680 SC, noise wise. Doesn’t actually give me much reference for how loud that actually is though.
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/53144-evga...

Need to find a review of the 280 to see how loud in db it was to compare.

Fuzz

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Project issue numbers (ex. [#12345]) turn into links automatically.
  • You can use Textile markup to format text.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Insert Flickr images: [flickr-photo:id=230452326,size=s] or [flickr-photoset:id=72157594262419167,size=m].
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • You may use [view:name=display=args] tags to display views.
  • Avast! This website be taken over by pirates on September 19th. Yarr!

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a Norwegian and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.